Is The Google Results Listing Being Infected With Too Much Clutter?

Of the search engines being employed in the UK, Google is the most prominent. It is almost a monopoly provider, despite the marketing efforts of Microsoft to promote Bing. It is the opinion of many industry observers that this dominance could be having an effect on its purpose, that of being a search tool. It could be said that there is now too much contamination on a Google results listing. How is this affecting yourbusiness’s domain’s search engine positioning and attempts to employ search engine optimisation?

In its attempts to enhance the results page, Google is applying significance criteria from several sources. It is also trying too much to provide results from its subsidiary enterprises that the search has decided will be meaningful, such as YouTube video and mapping, when often these are totally irrelevant. There comes a time when these extras become a blur and less prominent: they become a nuisance, not a benefit. Paid adverts are also a nuisance, but they are tolerated to some degree because they are financing the search engine. They are usually more peripheral and not infecting the organic results page.

On the normal Google front page in the UK there is a button that can be selected to specify “pages from the UK”. Other national home pages show an equivalent button. Many users are suggesting that additional buttons be available so that certain types of result are not included. If a search request specifies the word “London”, then a map may be relevant, but it could be a reference to the author “Jack London” so a map would be irrelevant. If a search does not require video and maps returned, this type of response could be excluded and the results page would then give a higher search engine positioning to web pages that are more meaningful.

There is also demand for buttons to eliminate the social services such as Facebook and Twitter. Google and the other search engines believe that they are trying to enhance the search result by including realtime data from these sources. To some search marketing professionals, this is a problem. search optimization cannot have any impact on the data supplied by a social network as any reference to a website can only be created from user entries, and it is very simple to arrange a campaign through Twitter to exaggerate the significance of a website and artificially improve its search engine positioning. This sort of action effectively corresponds to spamming. This leads to loss of popularity of the search engine and of the given website. If a button to exclude feeds from the social systems was made available, it would allow enterprises whose websites have been optimised using current search optimization skills to achieve a more reliable ranking.

There is so much than can be done by applying search engine optimisation skills to your business’swebsite to improve its profile on a results page. However no amount of search optimization is going to remove all of the obstructions so that a possible buyers can see you through the contamination.

Google could succumb to user requests and add the flexibility that users are requesting. Doing so would restore its popularity with users. By applying search engine optimisation to your business’s website now, the website is prepared for when it happens.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply